Today is the day EA fans have been waiting for, BF3 will be launch, and on November 8th, its rival MW3 will release as well. There have been many argues about who will be the best. As the most experienced of the Asdaqua crew, I give my pros, cons and final verdict of the 2 games.
DISCLAIMER: I am an amateur gamer, do not expect any IGN-quality reviews.
We start with BF3, BF3 was created by DICE and EA, and already has a beta for people who want to test things out. DICE has also added a Campaign, to have more feel, into the lovey background graphics. The vehicle variety has expanded more, AA vehicles, LAVs, jets, troop helis, attack helis, tanks, APCs, boats, and more. The online gameplay has made a big improvement, as you really feel like a Marine in the front lines. A nice HUD responds by bouncing up and down, when you sprint. BF3 focues on a more “realistic sceneraio, whereas MW2 focused on the Russian invasion of the U.S. But somewhat low FPS levels may effect game play. Rating: 9.5/10.
Activision will try to continue to hold the title: “Most popular FPS”. MW3 will normally have its tension building campaign, and the online gameplay. Unlike BF3, which needs teamwork to actually win games, whereas MW3 basically counts on a high prestige guy running around in the enemy’s spawn with an Intervention or FAMAS, with claymores. Though MW3 will not include the popular zombies mode, it will have a new mode called Survival. Basically you start out with a gun, and earn cash by killing enemies from constant rounds. You can buy turrets, guns, explosives, support and much more. Rating: 9/10.